brooksmoses: (Default)
[personal profile] brooksmoses
As [livejournal.com profile] novalis pointed out in comments, my understanding of the voting rules was wrong in a detail, and that means the analysis I posted yesterday wasn't quite right.

Here's an updated version of the original post, explaining why the instant runoff isn't as broken as I thought. Given that, I'm now recommending voting for [livejournal.com profile] rm and [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy in whatever rank-positions best reflect your preferences. Personally, I've seen several strong personal recommendations for [livejournal.com profile] rm, so I've given her my top vote.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
Page generated Jan. 20th, 2026 06:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios