A couple of things recently came into conjunction to get me started thinking about artificial intelligence -- Russ recently posted about a recent set of chess games between Gary Kasparov and X3d-Fritz, and there's a thread on rec.arts.sf.composition discussing artificial intelligences and what they hypothetically could or could not be programmed to do.
So, I ended up writing a fairly substantial usenet post about this, and decided that it might also be of interest to post here (with a bit of editing) as well. The subject, primarily, is what the differences are between "weak AI" and "strong AI", and in particular whether or not it's necessary to emulate human capability to "think" on the inside in order to produce something that's functionally equivalent on the outside, and whether it is in fact valid to distinguish between the two.
My conclusion on the matter is that there is a very distinct difference between having intelligence and acting with an outward appearance of the same, and that it is quite possible to produce the latter by having a capability to do a vast amount of simplistic things that are not themselves (either individually or in the aggregate) an actual intelligence.
( Argument by Chess Games )
So, I ended up writing a fairly substantial usenet post about this, and decided that it might also be of interest to post here (with a bit of editing) as well. The subject, primarily, is what the differences are between "weak AI" and "strong AI", and in particular whether or not it's necessary to emulate human capability to "think" on the inside in order to produce something that's functionally equivalent on the outside, and whether it is in fact valid to distinguish between the two.
My conclusion on the matter is that there is a very distinct difference between having intelligence and acting with an outward appearance of the same, and that it is quite possible to produce the latter by having a capability to do a vast amount of simplistic things that are not themselves (either individually or in the aggregate) an actual intelligence.
( Argument by Chess Games )