brooksmoses: (Default)
[personal profile] brooksmoses
So, there's currently an election going on for LiveJournal's "user advocate". Nearly all of you all are eligible to vote. Candidate's position statements are here.

Important edit: As [livejournal.com profile] novalis pointed out in comments, the documentation of the voting protocol is unclear, and I interpreted some of it a bit differently than what the actual LJ source code implements. This revises my analysis considerably! What follows is the revised analysis.

Note that this is somewhat of an interesting election. Nominally, it's one of the "instant runoff" votes where voters rank the candidates, and the candidates who have fewest first-rank votes are eliminated and "their" voters have their second-rank votes taken as first-rank votes. If a voter has all three of their candidates eliminated, their ballot is discarded; when a candidate ends up with more than 50% of the top-rank votes on remaining ballots, they're declared the winner.

What's interesting is that it's not a closed-tally election. Anyone who has voted can (a) immediately see the current totals, and (b) change their vote. It's not currently possible to see exactly what will happen in the runoffs, but we can make some reasonable guesses on the bounds.

Meanwhile, regardless of how the runoff goes, it's currently a three-way race between [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy, [livejournal.com profile] jameth, and [livejournal.com profile] rm, in that order. Unless things swing dramatically, votes for anyone else are likely to only serve as endorsements of their position statements, which isn't likely to mean much.

Thus, unless things change notably, the only votes that are likely to matter are votes for [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy, [livejournal.com profile] rm, or [livejournal.com profile] jameth.

Personally, from a quick look through the position statements, I suspect that I would prefer [livejournal.com profile] rm to [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy (and I have seen several strong endorsements agreeing with that position), but I'm pretty sure either would do well, while it's clear that [livejournal.com profile] jameth would not be an effective user representative, to say the least. Given the current totals, it seems pretty clear that [livejournal.com profile] rm won't catch [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy in the first-rank votes; their votes are running about 2.5:1 between them. There is some danger that [livejournal.com profile] jameth will catch up, though; that ratio is about 1.5:1.

However, [livejournal.com profile] rm may not be that far behind [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy in the runoff, since she's got quite a lot of second-rank votes; there's a reasonable chance she could catch [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy once those are counted. (Of course, if a lot of those are from the people who have [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy as their first choice, then they'll never count.)

Old, erroneous analysis:
What's interesting is that it's not a closed-tally election. Anyone who has voted can (a) immediately see the current totals, and (b) change their vote. It's not currently possible to see exactly what will happen in the runoffs, but we can tell that it doesn't matter; there's nobody who is currently on the ballots of 50% of the voters (the leader's a bit over 40%), so the instant runoff can't pick a winner.

Thus, unless things change notably, the only vote that is likely to matter is your first-rank vote.

Meanwhile, looking at the first-rank votes, it's currently a three-way race between [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy, [livejournal.com profile] jameth, and [livejournal.com profile] rm, in that order. Unless things swing dramatically, votes for anyone else are likely to only serve as endorsements of their position statements, which isn't likely to mean much.

Thus, unless things change notably, the only vote that is likely to matter is a vote for [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy, [livejournal.com profile] rm, or [livejournal.com profile] jameth.

Personally, from a quick look through the position statements, I suspect that I would prefer [livejournal.com profile] rm to [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy, but I'm pretty sure either would do well, while it's clear that [livejournal.com profile] jameth would not be an effective user representative, to say the least. Given the current totals, it seems pretty clear that [livejournal.com profile] rm won't catch [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy; their votes are running about 2.5:1 between them. There is some danger that [livejournal.com profile] jameth will catch up, though; that ratio is about 1.5:1.

Also, I'll note that [livejournal.com profile] rm is not that far behind [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy in the runoff, since she's got quite a lot of second-rank votes; there's a very outside chance she could catch [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy there and have more than 50% of the vote, if things do change a lot. This is not a likely scenario at all, but it's the most plausible way that a second-rank vote might matter at all.

Therefore, my practical endorsement is this: Vote [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy at first-rank, [livejournal.com profile] rm at second-rank, and put your third-rank vote on someone you like.


Therefore, my practical endorsement is this: Vote [livejournal.com profile] rm at first-rank, [livejournal.com profile] legomymalfoy at second-rank, and put your third-rank vote on someone you like. If you've already voted, go here to change your vote.

(See, this is much easier than trying to pick among the at-least-a-half-dozen really good candidates who are running!)

Profile

brooksmoses: (Default)
brooksmoses

October 2024

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 05:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios