brooksmoses: (Default)
[personal profile] brooksmoses
Somewhat recently, I was poking at various slide/film scanners on eBay, and came across a Nikon Coolscan II that was advertised as "not tested, makes funny noise on power-up". And, being a bit overconfident in my repair skills if it indeed had something messed up internally, I bought it. It turns out that it does, indeed, make a horribly loud clattery noise at the end of its power-up proceedure. This, according to the helpful regulars on comp.periphs.scanners, is what the autofocus mechanism normally sounds like. And, when I finally got it hooked up and found a slide to test it with (since it didn't come with the film adaptor), it does indeed work perfectly well.

So I ordered a film adaptor for it (which turned out to cost twice as much as the scanner itself cost), and finally got to try that out this evening.

I was quite pleasantly surprised by the results -- and reminded that there's still a lot of difference between the quality of my digital camera and a comparably-priced 35mm SLR, even though the resolution is nearly comparable. Part of it is the difference between optics that weigh a quarter-pound, and optics that weigh a quarter-ounce; the focus is sharper, and in the better photos everything in the image is in sharp focus down to the pixel level -- and it's an 8 megapixel image. But a large part of the difference is in the colors; I finally have an image that shows what [livejournal.com profile] suzimoses means when she says California is the wrong shade of green.



That's just a random patch of woods behind an abandoned garage, in the middle of June after a few rainy days. It's not something exceptionally green, either; everywhere that has plants is nearly that color, everywhere you look. (Even the side of the old garbage truck is turning a bit green in spots.) I haven't pushed the saturation on the scanner, either; that's actually toned down slightly, since I had to shift the picture slightly magenta to white-balance it.

That is what the "right shade of green" looks like.

Date: 2005-01-07 07:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ritaxis.livejournal.com
So the right shade of green is kind of halfway between emerald and chartreuse?

I think I know what you're objecting to -- California is every color of green except that. It's grey green, it's forest green, it's black green, it's viridian, it's blue green, it's lichen green, it's brownish, yellowish, pale and dark green.

But, for those of us who grew up with it, that is the right shade of green.

In my scrapbook I've put more pictures of walking with the dog in the winter, all green. (I'm about to put even more, including a shot of a mountain lion warning sign from a city park: it will be "DeLaveaga" under "Fecundity")

Date: 2005-01-07 06:31 pm (UTC)
keshwyn: Watering can with a plant growing out of it. (garden)
From: [personal profile] keshwyn
Whereas my mother (who grew up in a desert-area where the green is much similar to California's) used to complain that the East Coast was -too- green. :)

I know exactly what [livejournal.com profile] suzimoses means.

Date: 2005-01-07 08:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ritaxis.livejournal.com
here it is! (http://pics.livejournal.com/ritaxis/gallery/0000b8d8)

Date: 2005-01-07 06:54 pm (UTC)
ext_153365: Leaf with a dead edge (Default)
From: [identity profile] oldsma.livejournal.com
I've been saying that Maryland is the wrong shade of green ever since I moved out here. Lots and lots of this glowing stuff, but none of the right greens.

MAO

Date: 2005-01-07 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leback.livejournal.com
Mmm. Looks like home. :-)
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 11:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios