Ok, seriously. What were they thinking?
Mar. 13th, 2007 11:44 pmSo I happened to load the main www.livejournal.com page just now, and they have an animated-GIF ad for the new "LJ Talk" service.
I think this is why real companies hire advertising departments.
Because, see, the tagline for the service really ought to be aimed at the target audience, not those of us who would be more likely to mock them.

And, really: "pants"?
I think this is why real companies hire advertising departments.
Because, see, the tagline for the service really ought to be aimed at the target audience, not those of us who would be more likely to mock them.

And, really: "pants"?
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 07:11 am (UTC)(Pardon, was discussing that bit of British slang with
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 09:27 am (UTC)Really. Concept, graphics, animation, tag-line - all done by a not-too-bright teenager.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 09:37 am (UTC)i much rather they do this sort of thing than that they worry at every step whether they're possibly hurting their "image". i really like a lot of the people who run LJ, i think they're good people, they have their hearts in the right spot, and even though some of their silliness isn't my kind of silliness, i take them any day over your average suit.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 09:46 am (UTC)it's something of an injoke. now, one can be judgmental of whether it belongs on the front page (i'd never put it there myself), but you're awfully quick to judge the people behind it in ways i consider unjustified. in my experience, most people who are involved in running LJ, and that includes the teenagers, are of rather above-average intelligence. their sense of humour might not jive with yours (it doesn't jive with mine all that much either), but that doesn't make them automatically young and stupid.
you sound like my parents. *wry grin*.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 10:08 am (UTC)What I should have said is that seeing a gif like that brings up these things in me - no matter if has any bearing on reality or not. My reaction is to not want to have anything to do with the whole thing. Basically, animated gifs annoy me a whole lot. Add to that the notion that since I IM, I must be into drama, and you have a major annoyance and an insult. That certainly rubs me the wrong way.
However, those are my issues. Pissing on the LJ that is not a mature way of dealing with that. Thanks for calling me on it.
AS for your parents, well, maybe you should introduce us? ;-)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 10:36 am (UTC)totally with you on finding animated gifs annoying (except for the rare funny one -- i especially HATE moving userpics). and i know that the LJ folks are totally steeped in their own culture (which does include vast swaths of drama and angst, even if it's not always emitted by teenagers), and that they don't really take their more mature demographic much into account, because really, that's not what they get to hear from every day -- and that it can be annoying to be tossed into the same black pot with the idiots if one is part of that more mature demographic.
as to my parents, uh, no. i haven't seen them since i ran away at 17. :) but i still listen to music that they'd find obscene, *snicker*.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 12:14 pm (UTC)Also, if IM produces instant drama for someone, they either like that (why wait until tomorrow for the drama you're going to have anyway?) or consider it an inevitable price for something they do like (the way I think of certain post-gym muscle soreness). It's not the medium: if I were going to have drama with my mother or my girlfriend, the telephone would be as capable of transmitting same as IM is. (Yes, I use IM to talk to my mother, who is old enough that she collects retirement income from both the UK and US systems.)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 03:03 pm (UTC)The drama thing is only too true, but I don't think it is exactly a selling point for the service.
And the animation is just annoying.
MAO
On the pants
Date: 2007-03-14 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 10:19 pm (UTC)Not that I've actually tried LJs IM service... but that has more to do with time and already having 3 other IM services :)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-17 09:12 am (UTC)I'm not sure I really count as mature (except if you look at my birth certificate) - I'm just not at all part of LJ's background or internal culture, so I don't "get it" at all. And so all I get is what their communication means in my little world.